Yeah, the moon is going to be pretty high, so I am thinking I would just shoot it with a longer lens and just forget about adding any landscape in the shot.I was envisioning doing a vertical with the eclipse sequence in Yosemite valley. The Moon would still have been high for totality, but I figured there'd be plenty of interest. The downside is that wide angles make the Moon small...
That sure sounds cool Bill, I hope it works out for you. That would be a great perspective. It's funny, I think all of the shots of Palouse Falls that I recall are shot from up top. It would be cool to see a shot of it from the bottom.It looks like clouds everywhere! I might take a chance and drive over to Palouse Falls. If I go down on the ledge or clear to the bottom, I might be able to get the falls and the moon without a using a real wide angle. Good luck you guys! Hopefully somebody gets a shot.
I hope they turned out. I was doing bracketing too, my problem might be that there was a thin layer of clouds up in the sky, so when I overexposed to get the red to show through on the partial eclipse time, there was a huge glowing hallow of the bright part of the moon with the thin clouds. So I bracketed, but it may be too much work to deal with.I shot a bunch of stuff with my Sigma 150-600mm from the driveway. I will have to get into it to see how it came out. I was trying a bracketed sequence that would allow for some detail in both the bright and eclipsed sections of the moon at once. We will see how that comes out and if I can manage anything useful from that.
ML