MonikaC
Well-Known Member
I went back up to the Wind Rivers since my last trip was so short. Jim Fox had shown me a photo to ask if I knew where it was, so I decided that must be a sign for where I should go. Since it's about an 8 hour drive and 9+ miles in, I decided to walk in a few miles (ended up being @2.7) the evening that I got there and shorten the next day's walk. As I assembled my stove to make dinner, the fuel canister felt suspiciously light. It had leaked (something I'd never had happen before) and the next morning, there was not enough left to boil water. My choices were few: have cold hydrated food or walk back out, get my other canister and walk back in. The advantage to the latter was that I could clean up the wads of toilet paper the previous inhabitants of the camp site had left. I was not prepared to clean up their feces that were running down the side of the boulder that I had unwittingly designated as my "kitchen" or the ones under rocks, but not buried. So my dog & I walked back out, re-supplied & walked back to camp, packed up and walked the rest of the way in to the Cirque of the Towers. I camped just below the pass as the lake (Lonesome Lake) had been found to have 378x the acceptable level of E. coli from human feces in it. No, I didn't miss a decimal point. Since I didn't remember exactly where the waterfall was, I took the next day "off" to scout it and moved my camp down closer as there are a myriad of unofficial trails that made it very difficult to find my way back even in daylight. Sky Safari showed the MW to be south, maybe a bit SSW. When I went back close to dark, it was actually pretty much straight west, so the places I had scouted to shoot from weren't going to work. The area at the base of the waterfall is the creek running out from it and willows covering boulders. Not wanting to step off a boulder into a deep hole or water in the dark, I made do with what I could actually see.
I had a 22mm equivalent f/4 lens, so stitched 2 shots together so I could get all of the waterfall & more of the MW. Because it was just f/4, I had to do a much longer exposure than I usually like to do (I prefer my stars to be round rather than oblate). C&C very welcome as I just got in last night after the 9 mile hike out & 8 hour drive back and my eyes won't be working right for probably a week
.
A subtler version from a single exposure.
I had a 22mm equivalent f/4 lens, so stitched 2 shots together so I could get all of the waterfall & more of the MW. Because it was just f/4, I had to do a much longer exposure than I usually like to do (I prefer my stars to be round rather than oblate). C&C very welcome as I just got in last night after the 9 mile hike out & 8 hour drive back and my eyes won't be working right for probably a week
.
A subtler version from a single exposure.
Last edited: