Jupiter & Moons

Bill Richards

Well-Known Member
My first attempt at planetary imaging - here is Jupiter and 4 of its largest moons (Jupiter has somewhere between 80 and 95 moons!). Unfortunately, the giant red spot was on the other side when I captured this, but I'll try again next month. Hopefully, I'll have better seeing so I can get a crisper image.

Jupiter with Moons & Labels.jpg


Equipment and Software:
=======================
Mount: iOption CEM40 w/iPolar
Telescope: Celestron EdgeHD 8
Auto-Focuser: Rigel Systems nFOCUS
Imaging Camera: ASI585MC
Imaging Software: FireCapture
Image Processing Software: PIPP, AutoStakkert, RegiStax, PhotoShop
 
My first attempt at planetary imaging - here is Jupiter and 4 of its largest moons (Jupiter has somewhere between 80 and 95 moons!). Unfortunately, the giant red spot was on the other side when I captured this, but I'll try again next month. Hopefully, I'll have better seeing so I can get a crisper image.

View attachment 65281

Equipment and Software:
=======================
Mount: iOption CEM40 w/iPolar
Telescope: Celestron EdgeHD 8
Auto-Focuser: Rigel Systems nFOCUS
Imaging Camera: ASI585MC
Imaging Software: FireCapture
Image Processing Software: PIPP, AutoStakkert, RegiStax, PhotoShop
wow, Bill, great capture, it really shows the size of Jupiter.

Oliver
 

JimFox

Moderator
Staff member
Awesome job Bill! This looks fantastic, and it's great seeing the moons. I had a great time watching you set up and capture this, I learned a lot.
 

Bill Richards

Well-Known Member
Awesome job Bill! This looks fantastic, and it's great seeing the moons. I had a great time watching you set up and capture this, I learned a lot.
I applied to some of the lessons learned from the weekend we were out there and trie again last weekend. The results were slightly better, but I think seeing is the limiting factor in the clarity of the planet itself.
 

JimFox

Moderator
Staff member
I applied to some of the lessons learned from the weekend we were out there and trie again last weekend. The results were slightly better, but I think seeing is the limiting factor in the clarity of the planet itself.
Gotcha, I was wondering if this was maybe from a 2nd session. So will seeing be better at times at the dark sky site there? Or do you need to head inland more to get some better seeing?
 

Bill Richards

Well-Known Member
Better seeing is really about laminar flow of the atmosphere. Sometimes you can have great seeing by the coast, but not usually. The best seeing is at the top of a high mountain where they atmosphere is very thin. The seeing has been better at TDS on some cold winter nights.
 

JimFox

Moderator
Staff member
Better seeing is really about laminar flow of the atmosphere. Sometimes you can have great seeing by the coast, but not usually. The best seeing is at the top of a high mountain where they atmosphere is very thin. The seeing has been better at TDS on some cold winter nights.
Thanks Bill!
 
Top Bottom