Ken Rennie
Well-Known Member
Having waited until Canon released their new high megapixel camera I have bought a new camera. Not the Canon which is very expensive here but a Sony A7R4. I really only take landscapes and never take video so 20 frames per second and 8k video mean nothing even 8 stops of shake reduction wouldn't stop me using a tripod just in case that 1/3rd of a second waterfall shot wasn't critically sharp. In the end the deciding factor was the Canon 100-500 RF lens which may be brilliant but it is far too heavy for me to carry all day whereas the Sony 100-400 or Sigma 100-400 are fairly light and far less expensive. So far so good with the Sony, it is lighter than my Nikon D810, has 2 SD card slots and not the frighteningly expensive new cards used by both Canon and Nikon. Went for a walk yesterday to try the camera out, the light was harsh but it gave me a chance to find clipping points. This is Blea Tarn in Cumbria, I walked up Side Pike, the little hill on the right of this image, to see how the heather was progressing.
Some work needed as I am underexposing by 2/3rd of a stop but the files are good and the 16-35GM lens and 24-105 lenses are both sharp. Ken
Some work needed as I am underexposing by 2/3rd of a stop but the files are good and the 16-35GM lens and 24-105 lenses are both sharp. Ken