Canon R5 early impressions

Jameel Hyder

Moderator
Staff member
I had put in an order to B&H for the R5 not expecting it to come anytime soon given a lot of people were still waiting for it with their orders from Late July. I ordered it mid Sept and lo and behold I received it in about 10 days. Not complaining though :)

I also ordered the RF-EF adapter (the plain one) which was also back ordered everywhere and received that as well a day after the R5. I subsequently also ordered the RF 24-105L. The plan is to use this combo for bulk of my shooting and use the other lenses with the adapter. I also ordered the Sunway Photo L bracket since was available and both RRS and Kirk were backordered. I am happy with all the choices so far. Unlike both RRS and Kirk, the Sunway Photo is a two piece unit and the the "L" can be removed if needed.

First impressions

The body felt good in the hands and is lighter than the 5DsR, not by a lot but still lighter. The EVF is nice and bright and I really like it. It was one of the things I wasn't sure about since my early experience with EVFs were not that great. This one didn't disappoint at all. One does notice that the lag when you pan - the sports shooters will notice it more. There is an option to increase the refresh rate but that consumes more battery. For my use it is a non issue since I primarily shoot landscape and nature and occasionally family. The EVF can be configured to show everything that one can on the rear LCD including the histogram, level and settings which is really nice.

Controls are different from the 5 series DSLRs which is something I got used to from many years of using it. It will take some time to adjust the muscle memory to adapt to it. The top LCD is smaller than the one in the DSLR, however it does show the mode(Av/Tv etc.) even when the camera is off.

IBIS is very good. I was able to hand hold and get pretty stable images at 1/5s (coupled with the lens IS).

The LCD is articulating and this is something I am not sure I like since with the L bracket its movement is both restricted and one needs to be careful that the LCD won't get accidently damaged. Without the L bracket the movement is not much of an issue.

The DR is significantly better than the 5DsR and it is one of the reasons I made the jump. I was easily able to push 2-3 stops in low light without the image falling apart. One thing I haven't yet played with is very high ISO. Based on what I have seen reported that is significantly improved as well.

That is it for now. Bottom line I am pretty happy with it. I plan to keep the 5DsR as a second body and in good light I can keep different lens mounted and not have to switch lenses in the field as much.

Happy to answer any questions anyone has.
 

JimFox

Moderator
Staff member
Thanks for that review Jameel. I am really glad to hear about the increased DR.

I think you made a smart move with getting the 24-105mm.

One thing that I think would be interesting to know is how well does it do at night. And how long of an exposure can you shoot before noise is an issue?
 

Ben Egbert

Forum Helper
Staff member
My big question is how it compares to the 5DSR for image quality when DR or noise is not an issue. The AA filter and 5MP less resolution on the R5 would seem to favor the 5DSR. I am also interested in how the 24-105 compares to the 24-70 f2.8 which has been one of the sharpest lenses I have ever owned.
 

Jameel Hyder

Moderator
Staff member
I have not done an apples to apples image quality comparison yet. I do find the images pretty sharp on this sensor. I've read up some reviews and most claim that there is no discernable difference in prints from these two bodies.

I like the 24-105L quite a bit. I have both the EF and RF versions and did a comparison and the RF version wins by a good amount esp. at the wide end. I have a pretty good copy of the EF version. I had the 24-70 v2 which I sold since I like the range of 24-105. Where the 24-70 really shines is wide open. Once stopped down to F9 and beyond the difference is not much. For landscape it really isn't the issue. The RF version of 24-70 2.8 is also reviewed as a fantastic lens. It is heavier and pricier of course. Once stopped down the 24-70 f4 L IS is a tad better and has the advantage of IS which the 2.8 version doesn't have.
 
Last edited:

Ben Egbert

Forum Helper
Staff member
Thanks Jameel. I am contemplating the 15-35 for night photography and as a primary and lighter lens than the 11-24 for landscapes.
 
Top Bottom