Instead of Thursday's Task

I am sure we all miss John. But while John is gone let's do a salvage task. This is an image I took in 2017 that was way too dark by several f-stops. I was able to bring back the darkest areas, crop it to a better composition, and clone out some background distractions. Please add your salvaged images. John should be back next week.

Here is the original.
anza original.jpg



Rework
anza rework.jpg
 

JimFox

Moderator
Staff member
Hey Doug,

Thanks so much for helping to fill in for John. We are definitely missing his Thursday Tasks.

I really like your rework. It's amazing the amount of detail that was so totally hidden in the ground! What a beautiful location. I think you can back off on the sky though, that looks to be a bit blown now. The sky in the original with the ground in the rework would be perfect if it's possible.
 
Hey Doug,

Thanks so much for helping to fill in for John. We are definitely missing his Thursday Tasks.

I really like your rework. It's amazing the amount of detail that was so totally hidden in the ground! What a beautiful location. I think you can back off on the sky though, that looks to be a bit blown now. The sky in the original with the ground in the rework would be perfect if it's possible.
How does this work, Jim?
anza rework.jpg
 

larryj

Well-Known Member
The original image as processed in Lightroom. The porta-poty, the man waiting to get in and the sign behind the pots were all distracting.
The Evergreen trees were a little dark.
I cloned out the distracting elements and opened the shadows in Photoshop.
The second image is the result and is the image I posted in the landscape thread this week! ;)



 

AlanLichty

Moderator
I am going to go with a shot of Wahclella Falls in the Columbia River Gorge from 2008 using a Canon 5D. This wasn't a camera that had a good track record for either noise levels in bad light or having anything resembling a good handle on dynamic range and both elements are present in this particular scene.

The original:

C5D_WahclellaFalls060208-o.jpg


and an effort to balance the light and colors:

C5D_WahclellaFalls060208.jpg
 

Jameel Hyder

Moderator
Staff member
I am going to go with a shot of Wahclella Falls in the Columbia River Gorge from 2008 using a Canon 5D. This wasn't a camera that had a good track record for either noise levels in bad light or having anything resembling a good handle on dynamic range and both elements are present in this particular scene.

The original:

View attachment 70997

and an effort to balance the light and colors:

View attachment 70998
Nice work to pull in the highlights in this.
 

AlanLichty

Moderator
An image I posted a couple of days ago. Add the image I started with. Had to tame both ends of the DR.

Original

Processed
I was guessing the original looked something like what you show above when you posted this one recently although the original turned out to a bit worse than I thought. Nice recovery.
 
I am going to go with a shot of Wahclella Falls in the Columbia River Gorge from 2008 using a Canon 5D. This wasn't a camera that had a good track record for either noise levels in bad light or having anything resembling a good handle on dynamic range and both elements are present in this particular scene.

The original:

View attachment 70997

and an effort to balance the light and colors:

View attachment 70998
Excellent recovery, Alan.
 

JimFox

Moderator
Staff member
I am going to go with a shot of Wahclella Falls in the Columbia River Gorge from 2008 using a Canon 5D. This wasn't a camera that had a good track record for either noise levels in bad light or having anything resembling a good handle on dynamic range and both elements are present in this particular scene.

The original:

View attachment 70997

and an effort to balance the light and colors:

View attachment 70998
It's funny that for as good of a company as Canon is, that the 5D was allowed to be produced even. At that time, it was so far behind what Nikon cameras of the same time were putting out, it's embarrassing. It's about that same time that a long of Canon users started to migrate to back to Nikon, but a larger majority I think went to Sony at that time.

And you would think Canon would have learned, but they doubled down and put out the 5D2 which was not any better, all of the weaknesses of the 5D continued on in the 5D2. It wasn't until the 5D3 that it got back on track.

That's my history lesson. :)

And that's a very good salvage job Alan. I do like the final result.
 

JimFox

Moderator
Staff member
Though not as dramatic a recovery as those above, some editing was necessary to show the intent of this photo. It is a picture at the Soda dam in the Jemez mountain area of New Mexico.

View attachment 71001

View attachment 71002
I love Soda Dam. My son doesn't live too far from there (Los Alamos) so I have visited that a few times. I have been meaning to get back there and make a video of it for my YouTube channel.

Now what's amazing is that there isn't a single person in your image. That place can be so crowded at times.

I like your edit Darrell and how you opened up the waterfall.
 

Kyle Jones

Moderator
It's funny that for as good of a company as Canon is, that the 5D was allowed to be produced even. At that time, it was so far behind what Nikon cameras of the same time were putting out, it's embarrassing. It's about that same time that a long of Canon users started to migrate to back to Nikon, but a larger majority I think went to Sony at that time.

And you would think Canon would have learned, but they doubled down and put out the 5D2 which was not any better, all of the weaknesses of the 5D continued on in the 5D2. It wasn't until the 5D3 that it got back on track.

That's my history lesson. :)

And that's a very good salvage job Alan. I do like the final result.
That (and the fact that I wasn't rolling in money) is why I skipped all of that when I went full frame and started with the 6D. It had a better sensor than the 5DIII (and the sensor is what I care most about), cost much less, and as a landscape photographer I had no need for the extra features of the 5-series.

I still miss my 6D. I'll have to look for an image from it to add to this thread.
 

AlanLichty

Moderator
It's funny that for as good of a company as Canon is, that the 5D was allowed to be produced even. At that time, it was so far behind what Nikon cameras of the same time were putting out, it's embarrassing. It's about that same time that a long of Canon users started to migrate to back to Nikon, but a larger majority I think went to Sony at that time.

And you would think Canon would have learned, but they doubled down and put out the 5D2 which was not any better, all of the weaknesses of the 5D continued on in the 5D2. It wasn't until the 5D3 that it got back on track.

That's my history lesson. :)

And that's a very good salvage job Alan. I do like the final result.
That an "interesting" history of Canon's full frame prosumer level camera which predated any similar offering from Nikon by 3 years. The D700 was Nikon's first full frame prosumer level camera in 2008 with 12.1 MP. The 5D MkII came out the same year with 20.1MP.

See Full-frame DSLR for an exact timeline.
 

AlanLichty

Moderator
That (and the fact that I wasn't rolling in money) is why I skipped all of that when I went full frame and started with the 6D. It had a better sensor than the 5DIII (and the sensor is what I care most about), cost much less, and as a landscape photographer I had no need for the extra features of the 5-series.

I still miss my 6D. I'll have to look for an image from it to add to this thread.
I originally bought a 6D as a backup for my 5D MkII and ended using the 6D full time once I looked at the images. Especially for low light. I still have my 6D.
 

Ken Rennie

Well-Known Member
Earlier this week I was giving a talk, to a local camera club, on processing. I knew the club well and decided that most people would get something useful out of my pitching it at a simple and quick level. At the start I asked if they would prefer lightroom or photoshop and , unfortunately for me, the wanted lightroom. I had a simple catalogue prepared and the images loaded and did a live demo of processing using their projector screen. This is a high risk strategy as it can go very wrong very quickly but fortunately all went well on the night. My stated aim was to go from RAW to finished in less than 5 minutes or if it was very complex to 95% finished in 5 minutes.
Here is a 2 minute example showing my best "trick" which is reducing the exposure by a stop or 2 and increasing the whites until it looks good. This works best on low contrast, low saturation scenes as it increases both. It is possible to use it on general scenes but the saturation can get out of hand very quickly. Works a treat on mono scenes giving punch.
2_DSF2687-1 before.jpg


I think that I have gone too far with this one but I was projecting it at the time and the projector doesn't have the crispness of a good monitor, that is my excuse anyway. Ken
2_DSF2687-1 after.jpg
 
Top Bottom