Milky Way over Bryce Canyon

AlanLichty

Moderator
Very nice Marcy. I like the use of silhouettes for the foreground instead of trying to fill in light that wasn't there.

I was hoping for a nice MW shot there a couple of weeks ago but didn't have the right moon cycle timed for that visit.
 

JimFox

Moderator
Staff member
This is very nice Marcy and a Pano to boot!

I personally go for a cooler WB in my star shots when the sky turns that color as it gets later in the night. But other then that, it looks pretty sweet.
 

Bart Carrig

Well-Known Member
Very nice pano, well executed. I'd say your new method worked very well. Like Jim, I tend to favor a cooler WB, but there's certainly nothing wrong with this beauty.

Bart
 

Ben Egbert

Forum Helper
Staff member
I have no idea how you stitch a MW shot with long exposure and moving stars, but you did a great job here and I like it a lot.
 

Marcy

Well-Known Member
I have no idea how you stitch a MW shot with long exposure and moving stars, but you did a great job here and I like it a lot.
It is not as hard as you might think LR does a great job_ 6 vertical shots overlapping about 25% @ 25 seconds f/2.8 iso 2500- then use LR to stitch the 6 shots together then process however you like
 

Ben Egbert

Forum Helper
Staff member
So I use ACR and Photoshop which ought to worm the same. but I never expected them to line up the stars. I recall trying to stack MW shots a few years back and PS could not align them. Maybe it has gotten better.
 

Kyle Jones

Moderator
The stars don't need to align perfectly. It definitely helps to have some land in the shot to help the alignment.
 

Marcy

Well-Known Member

Ben Egbert

Forum Helper
Staff member
Thanks Marcy, I will have to try this next time I have an opportunity. I have used star stacking programs in the past, but maybe 5 years ago and it was clutzy and my computer was not up to the task.
 
Top Bottom